Models relating soil pH measurements in H2O, KCl and CaCl2 for volcanic ash soils of Cameroon (2023)

Table of Contents
Geoderma Regional Abstract Introduction Section snippets Description of study site, soil sampling and sample preparation Soil EC and pH measurements in H2O, KCl and CaCl2 Conclusion Funding Declarations of interest References (32) Knowledge and management of soil fertility by farmers in western Cameroon Geoderma Reg. Crop response to lime in the southern United States Electrical conductivity and chemical composition of soil solution: comparison of solution samplers in Tropical soils Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo. Effects of forest clearance and cultivation on bulk density variations and relationships with texture and organic matter in tephra soils of mount Kupe (Cameroon) Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. The influence of electrolyte solutions on soil pH measurements Rev. Chim. (Bucharest) Field pH Alleviating soil acidity with crop residues Soil Sci. Conversion of soil pH 1:2.5 KCl and 1:2.5 H2O to 1:5 H2O: conclusions for soil management, environmental monitoring, and international soil databases Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Determination of pH of soils by different methods: collaborative study J. AOAC Int. Oil palm responses to nitrogen and drip irrigation in a wet monsoonal climate in peninsular Malaysia Salt concentration and measurement of soil pH Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation Water Resour. Res. Using pedo-transfer functions for estimating soil pH and bulk density at regional scale Environmental Chemistry of Soils Models relating soil pH measurements in water and calcium chloride that incorporate electrolyte concentration Eur. J. Soil Sci. Monitoring electrical conductivity and nitrate concentrations in an Andisol field using time domain reflectometry JARQ Cited by (13) Do heavy metals affect bacterial communities more in small repeated applications or in a single large application? Artisanal gold mining in the eastern Amazon: Environmental and human health risks of mercury from different mining methods Adsorption of nitrate, phosphate, nickel and lead on soils: Risk of groundwater contamination CORRELATION BETWEEN SOIL PH MEASURED IN TWO ELUENTS IN THE CASE OF AGRICULTURAL LAND: CONCLUSIONS REGARDING SOIL REACTION CLASSES Rhizosphere Environmental Effects on Cadmium Phytoaccumulation and Potentially Phytoavailable Cadmium in Soil Simple and Multivariate Linear Regression Models for pH Conversion Between Measurement Techniques Recommended articles (6) Kinetic parameters of soil organic matter decomposition in soils under forest in Hungary Assessing the ability of soil tests to estimate labile phosphorus in agricultural soils: Evidence from isotopic exchange Salt-affected soils of the coastal plains in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Phosphorus transformations in alfisols and ultisols under different land uses in the atlantic forest region of Brazil Extractable aluminium in New Zealand Andisols and Inceptisols Soil texture strongly controls exogenous organic matter mineralization indirectly via moisture upon progressive drying — Evidence from incubation experiments FAQs

Geoderma Regional

Volume 14,

September 2018

, e00185

Author links open overlay panel, , ,

Abstract

Soil pH, apparently the most routinely measured soil property is an important indicator of soil quality, serves as a guide for fertilizer recommendations and liming requirements, and is an index of biogeochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems. This study was conducted to establish relationships among different pH measurements of surface soils (0–20 cm) derived from volcanic ash parent materials in different electrolytes and soil-to-solution ratios following standard methods. Soil pH increased with increase in solution volume and for a particular soil-to-solution ratio; the trend in pH values was pH H2O > pH 0.01 M CaCl2 > pH 1 M KCl. Electrical conductivity values were very low (mean = 0.04 ± 0.01 dSm−1) and were highly and negatively correlated with pH H2O and pH CaCl2. pH CaCl2 values were on average 0.43 units lower than those measured in water, while those measured in KCl were on average 0.73 units lower than those measured in water. Models relating different pH and EC measurements (n = 38) yielded R2 values ranging from 0.774–0.978. Model validation using a dataset of 59 points gave R2 values ranging from 0.843 to 0.958; RMSE from 0.06–0.09; MAE from 0.05–0.09 and index of agreement from 0.75–0.78. The models developed in this study are useful in quality control of pH measurements, for converting pH values of volcanic ash – derived soils in different electrolytes and soil-to-solution ratios and contribute to information necessary for the development of soil data bases at local and regional levels.

Introduction

Soil pH is an important indicator of soil quality (Hue, 2011). It plays a significant role in many soil processes such as solubility and availability of plant nutrients, microbial activity and decomposition of soil organic matter, sorption of contaminants and a variety of physico-chemical processes involved in biogeochemical cycling. Soil chemists have often referred to soil pH as the “master variable” because it controls ion exchange, dissolution/precipitation, reduction/oxidation, adsorption, and complexation reactions (McBride, 1994). In agricultural fields, soil pH provides information on liming and fertilizer requirements and on the effectiveness of herbicides. Additionally, soil pH is very important because it serves as an index of soil weathering and mineral transformations. Since soil pH influences many other soil parameters and is relatively easy to determine in the laboratory, it constitutes an important parameter in establishing pedotransfer functions (Seybold et al., 2009; Seybold and Libohova, 2017). Therefore, soil pH data needs to be readily interpretable, relatively precise and should not be estimated from other soil quality indicators (Seybold et al., 2003). Soil pH is one of the most measured parameters in soil analysis and different methods are usually employed, depending on the needs or objectives of the study. For example, the standard field pH measurement is performed with a 1:1 soil-to-water mixture so that comparisons of pH readings are done on an equivalent basis (Soil Science Division Staff, 2017). Thus, more dilute samples such as 1:5 soil-to-water ratio generally have a higher pH value, while less dilute samples generally have lower pH values. Secondly, other methods of measuring pH involving different electrolyte solutions are also used in soil survey for specific purposes, especially those required for some taxonomic criteria in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Science Division Staff, 2017). For example, using a 0.01 M CaCl2 solution has the advantage of dampening seasonal variation in pH. That is, a concentration of 0.01 M CaCl2 is approximately equal to the salt concentration of the soil solution in many fertile soils (Schofield and Taylor, 1955). This implies that even if a soil received manure or fertilizer immediately before it is sampled for soil pH determination, the error due to variation in salt concentration of the soil would be negligible if the pH measurement was done in a 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (Kissel et al., 2009). The role of 1 M KCl solution is to test for the presence of exchangeable Al. The absolute value of 1 M pH KCl bears a strong correlation with Al saturation. This higher concentrated salt solution displaces H+ and Al3+ ions completely from the exchange complex. Aluminum, displaced by K+ on the exchange complex, consumes OH ions and increases H+ concentration. As a result, the solution pH is lowered. Generally, exchangeable aluminum is present if the pH 1 M KCl is ≤5.2. If the pH 1 M KCl is >5.2, aluminum becomes non-exchangeable due to processes such as hydrolysis, polymerization and precipitation (USDA-NRCS, 2005). Thus, a 1 M KCl solution is used to infer aluminum saturation levels in some great groups of Oxisols (e.g., Acrudox). If the criteria are met, aluminum toxicity may be a concern and so, proper management options will be used. Furthermore, the comparison of pH 1 M KCl with pH H2O provides an assessment of the nature of the net charge on the colloidal system. The numerical difference in the values of pH measured in 1 M KCl and H2O (pH KCl – pH H2O) is referred to as the delta pH. When this difference is negative, the colloid has a net negative charge (cation exchange capacity), and when positive, it has a net positive charge (anion exchange capacity). Additionally, a 1 M NaF solution is used to infer the presence of short-range order minerals such as allophanes and it is used in defining the criteria for the isotic mineralogy class (Soil Science Division Staff, 2017).

In most laboratories of soil analysis in Cameroon, routine soil pH measurements are often performed following the AFNOR standard NF X-31-103 (1988), which recommends a 1:2.5 soil-to-water ratio, and the International standard NF ISO 10390 (1994) which recommends a 1:5 soil-to-water ratio. However, the latter is not commonly used, likely because soil pH data obtained from measurements with 1:2.5 soil-to-water ratio are given more preference to inform on soil acidity levels and nutrient availability (i.e. mostly for soil fertility investigations and fertilizer recommendations). However, the influence of electrolyte concentration on soil pH measurements has been reported in many studies (Hossner, 2008) and have found great application in various domains such as in the harmonization of global soil maps (Libohova et al., 2014); in developing pedotransfer functions (Libohova et al., 2014; Minasny et al., 2011); and for guiding on soil analysis in the laboratory (Kalra, 1995; Kissel et al., 2009; Thomas, 1996).

Volcanic ash soils are among the most fertile soils of Cameroon and are intensively used for agricultural production. However, information on the chemical properties of these soils, notably soil pH, is sparse. Therefore, the objective of this work was to determine the pH of volcanic ash soils from Cameroon in different solutions and soil-to-solution ratios in order to establish their relationships with one another using statistical models. To our knowledge, such models do not exist for volcanic ash soils of Cameroon. The relationships are meant to guide on pH measurements in routine laboratory analyses and to contribute to information necessary for developing soil data bases.

Section snippets

Description of study site, soil sampling and sample preparation

In this study, soil samples were collected from the surface (0–20 cm) horizons of cultivated farmlands in different locations along the slopes of mount Kupe (located between latitudes 4°43′N and 4°52′N and longitudes 9°38′ E and 9°47′ E) in southwest Cameroon. The study area has a tropical wet (Af) climate with two main seasons: the rainy season which spans from March to November (mean annual rainfall = 3095.6 mm) and the dry season from November to March (mean annual temperature = 25.2 °C),

Soil EC and pH measurements in H2O, KCl and CaCl2

A summary of the data used in this study is shown in Table 1 and the frequency distribution plots are shown in Fig. 1. pH values were highest in water, followed by CaCl2 and lastly in KCl. In general, pH values measured in water and in KCl increased with increase in solution volume, this as a result of the dilution effect. Thomas (1996) observed that increase in soil pH with increasing soil-to-solution ratio was due to a reduction in proton (H+) dissociation from soil surfaces and less

Conclusion

Results of pH measurements obtained in this study showed that all soil samples had a net negative charge and provide information for proper management. Differences in soil pH values in different solution volumes were due to the dilution effect, while variability in soil electrical conductivity was due to different concentrations of soluble salts as influenced by various environmental and management factors. Seven simple linear regression models and one multiple linear model incorporating soil

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declarations of interest

None.

(Video) Mendeley Reference Manager for Desktop Tutorial

References (32)

  • G.K. Kome et al.

    Knowledge and management of soil fertility by farmers in western Cameroon

    Geoderma Reg.

    (2018)

  • F. Adams

    Crop response to lime in the southern United States

  • D.L. Carmo et al.

    Electrical conductivity and chemical composition of soil solution: comparison of solution samplers in Tropical soils

    Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.

    (2016)

  • R.K. Enang et al.

    Effects of forest clearance and cultivation on bulk density variations and relationships with texture and organic matter in tephra soils of mount Kupe (Cameroon)

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.

    (2017)

  • T. Gavriloaiei

    The influence of electrolyte solutions on soil pH measurements

    Rev. Chim. (Bucharest)

    (2012)

  • L.R. Hossner

    Field pH

  • N.V. Hue

    Alleviating soil acidity with crop residues

    Soil Sci.

    (2011)

  • C. Kabala et al.

    Conversion of soil pH 1:2.5 KCl and 1:2.5 H2O to 1:5 H2O: conclusions for soil management, environmental monitoring, and international soil databases

    Pol. J. Environ. Stud.

    (2016)

  • Y.P. Kalra

    Determination of pH of soils by different methods: collaborative study

    J. AOAC Int.

    (1995)

  • K.K. Kee et al.

    Oil palm responses to nitrogen and drip irrigation in a wet monsoonal climate in peninsular Malaysia

  • D.E. Kissel et al.

    Salt concentration and measurement of soil pH

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.

    (2009)

  • D.R. Legates et al.

    Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1999)

  • Z. Libohova et al.

    Using pedo-transfer functions for estimating soil pH and bulk density at regional scale

  • M.B. McBride

    Environmental Chemistry of Soils

    (1994)

  • B. Minasny et al.

    Models relating soil pH measurements in water and calcium chloride that incorporate electrolyte concentration

    Eur. J. Soil Sci.

    (2011)

  • T. Miyamoto et al.

    Monitoring electrical conductivity and nitrate concentrations in an Andisol field using time domain reflectometry

    JARQ

    (2015)

  • Cited by (13)

    • Do heavy metals affect bacterial communities more in small repeated applications or in a single large application?

      2023, Journal of Environmental Management

      Heavy metals from anthropogenic sources accumulate slowly but steadily, leading to high metal concentration levels in soil. However, the effect of each heavy metal on soil bacterial communities is usually assessed in laboratories by a single application of individually spiked metals. We evaluated the differences between single individual application and repeated individual applications of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn on bacterial communities, through pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT), using bacterial growth as the endpoint (3H-leucine incorporation method). We found that PICT development was higher when soil was spiked in individual single application than individual repeated applications for Cu, Ni and Zn. In contrast, bacterial communities did not show different tolerance between singly or repeatedly when soil was spiked with Cr. In the case of Pb any increase of bacterial community tolerance to this metal was found despite high doses applied (up to 2000mgkg−1). These results are relevant for the interpretation of the effects of heavy metals on soil microbes in order to avoid laboratory overestimations of the real effects of heavy metals on soil microbes.

    • Artisanal gold mining in the eastern Amazon: Environmental and human health risks of mercury from different mining methods

      2021, Chemosphere

      Artisanal gold (Au) mining is the activity with the highest consumption of mercury (Hg) and the main source of environmental contamination by this element, which is a recurring problem in the Amazon. In this study, contamination and risks caused by Hg to the environment and human health were evaluated in different forms of artisanal Au mining in the Brazilian Amazon. For this purpose, 25 samples of soils and tailings were collected in three types of artisanal mine and one native forest. The mineralogical analysis revealed that there is no occurrence of minerals constituted by Hg. However, the concentrations of Hg in underground mining tailings were very high and exceeded the prevention values established by Brazilian environmental legislation, indicating elevated risk to the ecosystem and human health. The enrichment factor indicated that underground mining tailings are enriched by Hg, submitted to cyanidation or not, suggesting anthropogenic source for the high concentrations of Hg. The geoaccumulation index and the contamination factor showed that the colluvial mining tailings are moderately contaminated, and the tailings from underground mining are highly to extremely contaminated, leading to very high risks to the environment and the health of children from the region. These results represent a great contribution to the Amazon, since they provide subsidies for the definition of policies to mitigate environmental contamination and associated risks.

    • Adsorption of nitrate, phosphate, nickel and lead on soils: Risk of groundwater contamination

      2019, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

      Agricultural activities pose a significant risk of groundwater pollution. Indeed, fertilizers and treated wastewater used for irrigation are, in part, responsible for the deterioration of groundwater and surface water quality. In some cases, soil may provide a protective barrier against this pollution, but this depends on the nature of the soil and the contaminant. This work presents the effect of the soil clay content on the retention of four different pollutants in order to evaluate the risk they represent for the groundwater. These contaminants are generated by two main agricultural activities: 1/soil fertilization with phosphate and nitrate fertilizers and 2/irrigation with treated wastewater in which heavy metals such as nickel and lead are persistent. Firstly, the characterization of the sand and clay used in this work was performed and showed a cation exchange capacity of 1.24 and 25 meq/100 g, a specific surface area of 0.12 and 67.98 m2/g and a percentage of organic matter of 0.15 and 2% for sand and clay, respectively. The retention isotherms on all pollutants and the Langmuir, Freundlich, Freundlich-Langmuir, Hill and Koble-Corrigan models were applied. All experimental isotherms have been successfully adjusted using the Koble-Corrigan expression. The amounts of nitrates, phosphates, nickel and lead retained by the sandy soil, for an initial pollutant concentration equal to 1 meq/L, were evaluated at 0.29, 3.89, 5.97 and 8.56 μeq/g respectively. In contact with a soil containing 30% clay, the adsorbed amounts were estimated at 3.55, 15.00, 6.97 and 8.79 μeq/g for nitrates, phosphates, nickel and lead, respectively. These results mean that the pollutants that pose the greatest risk of groundwater contamination when carried by water through sandy soil are classified as follows lead < nickel < phosphate < nitrate while for a clayey soil, the classification becomes as follows: phosphates < lead < nickel < nitrate.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Recommended articles (6)

    • Research article

      Kinetic parameters of soil organic matter decomposition in soils under forest in Hungary

      Geoderma Regional, Volume 14, 2018, Article e00187

      To obtain better knowledge on how soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition is regulated by different soil properties, 13 soil samples amended with maize residues were incubated for 163 days. Carbon mineralization kinetics was modelled by fitting five different kinetic models, from which the first-order two pools model was selected for further analysis. The results showed that residue addition increased the rate of C mineralization, particularly in sand samples, where four times as much C was released as CO2 in amended samples as in control samples. Residue addition also affected the kinetic parameters of the two C pools modelled. The mean residence time (MRT) averaged 31.9 days for the fast C pool and 65.1 days for the slow C pool phase in the amended soils, whereas in the control soils MRT1 and MRT2 averaged 52.3 and 94.2 days, respectively. The kinetics of C decomposition was found to be influenced to the greatest extent by soil organic carbon (SOC) content and soil texture. The texture primarily affected the size of the fast carbon pool (C1): in both the amended and control samples C1 was increased by the clay content (r = 0.574 and r = 0.554, respectively) and decreased by the sand content (r = −0.771 and r = −0.583, respectively). Our results confirm the fact that texture has a significant role in soil organic matter mineralization, however other parameters also play a crucial role in the decomposition due to the complexity of the processes.

    • Research article

      Assessing the ability of soil tests to estimate labile phosphorus in agricultural soils: Evidence from isotopic exchange

      Geoderma, Volume 337, 2019, pp. 350-358

      Efficient phosphorus (P) fertilization strategies are essential for intensive crop production with minimal negative environmental impacts. A key factor in sustainable P use is assessment of the plant available soil P pool using soil P tests. This study determined isotopically exchangeable P after six days of reaction with 33PO4 (P-E (6 d)) to determine how accurately two commonly used P tests, Olsen and AL (acid ammonium acetate lactate) can quantify the amount of labile P. Soil samples were taken from both highly P-amended and unamended plots at six sites within the Swedish long-term soil fertility experiments. According to P K-edge XANES spectroscopy, the P speciation was dominated by Al-bound P and organic P, with additional contributions from Fe-bound P and Ca phosphates in most soils. The results showed that the AL test overestimated P-E (6 d) by a factor of 1.70 on average. In contrast, the Olsen test underestimated P-E (6 d), with the mean ratios of P-Olsen to P-E (6 d) being 0.52 for high-P and 0.19 for low-P soils. The 33P/31P ratio in the Olsen extract of a 33PO4 spiked soil was closer to that of a 0.005 mol L−1 CaCl2 soil extract than the corresponding ratio in the AL extract, suggesting that AL extraction solubilized more non-labile P. In conclusion, the AL and Olsen methods are not suitable for direct quantification of the isotopically exchangeable soil P pool after 6 days of equilibration. However, based on the results, Olsen may be superior to AL for classification of soil P status, due to its even performance for calcareous and non-calcareous soils and lower extraction of non-labile P.

    • Research article

      Salt-affected soils of the coastal plains in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

      Geoderma Regional, Volume 14, 2018, Article e00186

      In Rio Grande do Sul (RS) State, Brazil, the soils are not prone to salinization due to the large amounts of rainfall, which are sufficient to leach the soluble salts. However, flooded rice crops grown in the coastal plains of RS may be affected by soil salinity, once the soils in this region are formed by marine, fluvial-lacustrine sediments. The use of water for irrigation of crops from sources connected with the Atlantic Ocean, especially Patos Lagoon, can lead to deposition of excessive amounts of sodium in the soil, especially in southern portion, by the proximity to channel linking the lagoon to the sea. This study aimed to map the occurrence of salt-affected soils in the coastal plains of RS State, Brazil. The study was performed in three regions: Internal Coastal Plain (ICP), External Coastal Plain (ECP) to Patos Lagoon and North Shore. 766 georreferenced soil samples were collected and levels of exchangeable sodium, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and electrical conductivity (EC) of saturated extract (ECse) were analyzed. The resulting analytical data of the sampling points were submitted to a descriptive statistic and used to generate maps aiming to depict the continuous spatial variation of each measured variable. Most of soil samples showed indicators of low soil salinity, especially in most of the ICP and North Shore. The soils most affected are concentrated in regions overlapping the paleochannels sub-surface previously identified in the sub-surface of the ECP and in areas closer to links between sources of freshwater and sea. In the ICP, the salinity problem was restricted to only some areas due to the use of saline water from Patos Lagoon.

    • Research article

      Phosphorus transformations in alfisols and ultisols under different land uses in the atlantic forest region of Brazil

      Geoderma Regional, Volume 14, 2018, Article e00184

      This study examined the impact of land use changes on phosphorus (P) transformations in soils of different pedogenesis with little or no addition of P in the humid tropical region. The sequential extraction method was used to determine P fractions, and structural equations modeling was employed to investigate the P cycle in soils under plantations of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis), rubber tree + cocoa (Theobroma cacao), rubber tree + acai palm (Euterpe oleracea), rubber tree + cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) and cocoa + erythrina (Erythrina glauca) as well as pastures (Brachiaria decumbens) and natural forests. The distribution of P fractions in soil appears to be affected by land use in all soil orders. Agroforestry systems of rubber tree + acai palm and rubber tree + cocoa showed high capacity to increase the concentrations of all the P fractions in soil compared to natural forest in soils of advanced stage of weathering. Pastures and rubber plantations provided higher concentrations of inorganic P fractions. The P fractionation method revealed the potential of labile fractions (resin-Pi + NaHCO3-Pi + Po) to supply appropriately the demand of all vegetation types evaluated in all soil orders. The structural model enabled to identify functional pools of P in soil, and to identify transformation processes of P in soil, in which organic P pool was the main P source for the available P pool and which part of the occluded P pool (recalcitrant) can be available for the plants.

    • Research article

      Extractable aluminium in New Zealand Andisols and Inceptisols

      Geoderma Regional, Volume 22, 2020, Article e00315

      It is critical to have a soil test that allows for the measurement of potential toxicity. A laboratory experiment was undertaken to investigate the effects of changing the concentration of salt in the extract and extraction time of the standard CaCl2 and KCl soil Al tests on the Al concentrations extracted from 13 soils from four New Zealand soil orders. Al extracted by KCl (AlKCl) was 13 times higher than extracted by CaCl2 (AlCaCl2) across all soils. The effect of changing extract salt concentration and extraction time on Al extracted differed among the four soil orders tested for the two extraction methods. Increasing the concentration of CaCl2 in the extract increased (P<.001; P<.05) the amount of AlCaCl2 (by 0.02–0.13 cmolc/kg) for the four soil orders, while increasing extraction time resulted in a difference only in the Allophanic soils, where AlCaCl2 decreased (P<.01). The interaction of the concentration of salt in the extract and extraction time for the CaCl2 extraction did not affect (P>.05) the AlCaCl2 extracted from all soils. An increase in the concentration of KCl in the extract up to 1M increased AlKCl (P<.01) (by 0.2–0.8 cmolc/kg) on the Allophanic, Brown and Pumice soils, with no increase (P>.05) with a further increase in concentration. Extraction time affected AlKCl (P<.001) for Pallic soils, while the interaction of concentration of KCl in the extract and extraction time resulted in differences (P<.001) only for the Pallic soils. These findings suggest that the Al concentrations measured by the two extraction methods are affected by specific soil properties in the topsoil related to soil order. This means that when measuring the Al bioavailability in soils, extreme care must be taken when interpreting soil Al test results.

    • Research article

      Soil texture strongly controls exogenous organic matter mineralization indirectly via moisture upon progressive drying — Evidence from incubation experiments

      Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Volume 151, 2020, Article 108051

      Soil texture is well known to directly affect bioavailability of organic matter to heterotrophs, but it also steers their activity by moderating soil moisture fluctuation. Disentangling these direct and indirect textural controls is, however, not trivial and attempts to do so are very scarce. Most attention has just gone to the stimulation of soil carbon (C) mineralization by soil moisture fluctuation per se. To quantify the indirect moisture-mediation control of soil texture on C mineralization, we monitored maize straw degradation in various soil texture/moisture regime combinations. Moisture levels were firstly kept fixed at 32% WFPS (experiment Fixed32) in a sand, sandy loam and silt loam soil or allowed to fluctuate between 20% and 50% water-filled pore space (WFPS, Dry-wet20-50). Total maize-C (Cmaize) mineralized was highly similar between these three textures and thus the direct textural control was minor. On the contrary with the fluctuating moisture level, around threefold more added Cmaize was mineralized (P<0.01) in the sand (86%) than in the silt loam (25%) soil. We owe this boost in Cmaize mineralization to the rewetting of larger pores in the sandy soil which should contain most of the ground maize residue. This determining control of texture on distribution of moisture as well as the maize substrate clearly exceeded the direct impact of texture on organic matter stability. In a third and fourth experiment, timing and dose to remoisten a silt loam soil back to 50% (experiment Equal20-50) or 35% WFPS (experiment Equal20-35) when dried out to 20% WFPS were additionally mimicked in the sand and sandy loam soils. These scenarios correspond more closely to a field situation in which nearby differently textured soils all receive the same precipitation input. After several rewetting cycles, the silt loam soil eventually had a 13.9% higher WFPS than the sandy soils. By then moisture stress clearly limited Cmaize mineralization in the sandy soil (0.13 (Equal20-50) and 0.05 (Equal20-35) mg kg−1 h−1) as it proceeded at only half of the rate as in the silt loam soil (0.21 (Equal20-50) and 0.12 (Equal20-35) mg kg−1 h−1). The amount of Cmaize mineralized after 120 days in the silt loam soil was simulated to surpass that in the sandy soil. We conclude that the effect of soil texture on decomposition of a fresh substrate is largely indirect, i.e. through mediation of soil water content and its distribution in the soil matrix. Moreover, our data suggests that in the event of prolonged drought Cmaize mineralization will be less limited in finer textured soil, contradicting the widespread idea that organic matter would degrade more rapidly in coarser textured soils.

    View full text

    © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    FAQs

    What is the difference between pH measured in water and CaCl2 Why are the values different? ›

    However, the pH difference between measurements in water and CaCl2 is related to the soil solution electrolyte concentration. We observed that the pH difference between the two methods became smaller with increasing soil electrical conductivity (EC).

    How do you measure soil pH in CaCl2? ›

    Soil pH in calcium chloride

    An air-dry soil sample is mixed with five times its weight of a dilute concentration (0.01M) of calcium chloride (CaCl2), shaken for 1 hour and the pH is measured using an electrode. The results are usually expressed as pH(CaCl2).

    What is the difference between pH H2O and pH KCl? ›

    The pH(KCl) value is when a diluted solution of potassium chloride (KCl) is used in the analysis, instead of water (H2O) which gives the pH(H2O) value. The pH(KCl) values are generally one pH unit lower than pH(H2O) values. If a soil has a pH(KCl) of less than 4,8 it can be regarded as being acidic.

    What is the relationship between soil pH measurements in calcium chloride and water suspension? ›

    in Calcium Chloride and Water Suspensions

    The relationship between the pH in a 1:5 soillwater suspension and the pH in 0.01 M CaC12 has always been considered to be linear, but recent findings favour a non-linear relationship.

    Why is the pH KCl different from the pH in water? ›

    It is well known that pHKCl is lower than pHH2O because KCl could extract more Al3+ from soil particles than water [1] , however, Table 1 showed that the lower extents are different in different regions, for examples, pHKCl was 0.07 - 1.99 units with a mean of 0.99 units lower than pHH2O for Guangxi, while 0.03 - 1.90 ...

    What is the soil pH KCl method? ›

    In a soil analysis, the pH is given as 'KCl' or 'H20'. The H20 method measures the pH of the soil solution, while the KCl (potassium chloride) includes the reserve acidity in the colloids. Both are neutral at 7. KCl readings are lower than H20 readings by approximately 1 point.

    How does CaCl2 change with pH? ›

    pH of CaCl2 solution decreases with concentration. FO process increases the pH of both NaCl feed solution and CaCl2 draw solution. Charges on salts also affect the pH of the solution.

    Why does CaCl2 lower pH? ›

    Yes, the pH will change because calcium is a lewis acid. It forms calcium hydroxide and liberates the hydrogen ion causing the pH to become lower.

    Does CaCl2 lower pH? ›

    Increasing calcium chloride from 0 to 50 mmol/dm' decreased the maximum rate of casein aggregation by 94% and decreased the pH from 5.2 to 4.5 at which aggregation was initiated.

    Why only KCl is used in pH meter? ›

    Thus, we used $KCl$ solution, since it is a good source of ions in the form of $C{l^ - }$ ions. Also, $KCl$ is neutral and thus does not participate or change the pH of the solution to be tested. Thus, due to these two factors, $KCl$ is used in the pH meter.

    Why is pH KCl lower than pH water? ›

    The pH measured in 1 M KCl or 0.01 M CaCl2 solution is typically lower than the pH of the same soil measured in water due to the higher concentration of H+ in the resultant suspension from cation exchange phenomenon.

    What happens to pH when KCl is added to water? ›

    The hydrogen in concentration will increase when HCl is added to water. The pH will decrease below pH 7 because of the increased hydrogen ion concentration.

    Does solubility of CaCl2 change with pH? ›

    So, the solubility of CaCl2andMgCl2 C a C l 2 a n d M g C l 2 is unaffected by the change in the pH since they are neutral salt. Lower the pH, higher will be the solubility of the sparingly soluble base or basic salt and vice-versa.

    How do you measure the pH and water content of soil? ›

    Testing pH Using Soil Strips
    1. Dig for a Sample. Using a hand trowel, dig four to six inches below the soil surface to obtain a soil sample. ...
    2. Collect the Soil. Place one to three teaspoons of soil in a clean glass. ...
    3. Pour in Distilled Water. ...
    4. Agitate the Soil. ...
    5. Drain the Sample. ...
    6. Use the pH Test Strip. ...
    7. Repeat the Process.
    Apr 24, 2022

    Why pH reading in 0.01 M CaCl2 is lower than pH in distilled water? ›

    The pH values obtained from the measurement of the calcium chloride solution are slightly lower than those measured in water due to the release of additional aluminum ions that hydrolyze.

    How does KCl affect pH? ›

    KCl addition to samples does not alter the pH significantly.

    Does KCl change the pH of water? ›

    In this study, we demonstrate theoretically, and confirm experimentally, that KCl additions always change the pH of water samples of low solute content when compared with unspiked water samples.

    Does KCl increase soil pH? ›

    KCl and K2SO4 are chemically neutral fertilizers. Therefore it is not expected to have influence soil pH. The plant in the field may have co-effect on pH. If the plant is to uptake very large amounts of K in this case the soil pH can shift towards acidic pH.

    How do you make KCl solution for pH? ›

    To make 125 mL of 3M KCl
    1. Using digital scale, place 27.96 g KCl powder into weigh boat.
    2. In 150 mL flask, mix 27.96 g KCl with 100 mL H2O.
    3. Put flask on hotplate/stirrer with stirbar until dissolved.
    4. Add H2O to bring volume to 125 mL.

    What does the difference between pH in water and pH in cacl2 depict? ›

    Buffer capacity is measured a different way, but the difference between pH in water and CaCl2 gives you an indication of buffer capacity.

    Does KCl solubility change with pH? ›

    As such, the ions formed, K+ and Cl− are extremely weak conjugate acid and base. Thus, they cannot react with water to form back KOH K O H and HCl H C l . This means that even if the pH of the solution is changed, it will not have an effect on the solubility of KCl K C l .

    What is the effect of cacl2? ›

    Calcium Chloride is a mineral indicated in the immediate treatment of hypocalcemic tetany (abnormally low levels of calcium in the body that cause muscle spasm). Calcium chloride injection is also used in cardiac resuscitation, arrhythmias, hypermagnesemia, calcium channel blocker overdose, and beta-blocker overdose.

    Does calcium increase or decrease soil pH? ›

    Higher calcium carbonate in soils increases pH making many nutrients less available. Particulates can drop out of water and plug emitters or microsprinklers.

    Is CaCl2 acidic or basic? ›

    CaCl2 is a salt of strong acid HCl and strong base Ca(OH)2. Thus it forms a neutral solution when dissolved in water.

    Does calcium increase pH in water? ›

    Calcium is an important determinant of water harness, and it also functions as a pH stabilizer, because of its buffering qualities. Calcium also gives water a better taste.

    Why do we use KCl in calibration? ›

    The most common solution for the calibration of conductivity meters is potassium chloride (KCl) because it is soluble and stable. The composition of conductivity standard solutions is a ratio of KCl: Water. The required ion concentration level of the standard solution determines the mix ratio.

    What is the concentration of KCl solution for pH meter? ›

    KCl is used in a concentration of 4 moles per cubic decimeter to immerse the pH meter electrode in a beaker.

    Does KCl lower pH? ›

    Increased Ca in the KCl extract resulted in a decrease in pH, as predicted from the equilibrium relations of calcite. The use of KCl pH with calcareous and acid soils is analogous in that the pH reflects CEC and the cationic composition of the exchange complex.

    What would happen if you mix potassium chloride KCl with water? ›

    Potassium chloride (KCl, or potassium salt) is a metal halide salt composed of potassium and chlorine. It is odorless and has a white or colorless vitreous crystal appearance. The solid dissolves readily in water, and its solutions have a salt-like taste.

    What happens when potassium chloride KCl dissolves in water? ›

    2: As potassium chloride (KCl) dissolves in water, the ions are hydrated. The polar water molecules are attracted by the charges on the K+ and Cl ions.

    What happens when KCl is dissolved in water KCl is the solute? ›

    Answer and Explanation: Option (a) is the correct answer. KCl(aq) means that the solute KCl is dissolved in water, forming a solution.

    What happens when CaCl2 dissolves in water? ›

    Calcium chloride when dissolved in water dissociates into its ions according to the following equation. CaCl 2 ( aq ) → Ca 2 + ( aq ) + 2 Cl - ( aq ) .

    Does solubility increase as pH increases? ›

    For ionic compounds containing basic anions, solubility increases as the pH of the solution is decreased. For ionic compounds containing anions of negligible basicity (such as the conjugate bases of strong acids), solubility is unaffected by changes in pH.

    What is the maximum solubility of CaCl2 in water? ›

    Calcium chloride
    Names
    Solubility in waterAnhydrous: 74.5 g/100 mL (20 °C) Hexahydrate: 49.4 g/100 mL (−25 °C) 59.5 g/100 mL (0 °C) 65 g/100 mL (10 °C) 81.1 g/100 mL (25 °C) 102.2 g/100 mL (30.2 °C) α-Tetrahydrate: 90.8 g/100 mL (20 °C) 114.4 g/100 mL (40 °C) Dihydrate: 134.5 g/100 mL (60 °C) 152.4 g/100 mL (100 °C)
    65 more rows

    What are the methods of pH measurement? ›

    There are two methods for measuring pH: colorimetric methods using indicator solutions or papers, and the more accurate electrochemical methods using electrodes and a millivoltmeter (pH meter).

    What are the methods of measuring soil water content? ›

    There is not at this time a single, clearly superior method under all circumstances for measurement of soil water content. The four principal methods currently in use are gravimetric sampling, neutron scattering, gamma attenuation, and time- domain reflectometry.

    Are the pH values the same for distilled water and tap water? ›

    Water derived from home water filters had an approximate pH of 7.5 as same as tap water. Swimming pool water had had pH between 7.2 and 7.5 while seawater had a pH of 8. Normal saline and distilled water had pH of 5.4 and 5.7, respectively.

    What is the pH in water and CaCl2? ›

    Some salts, such as CaCl2 don't react with the water and merely dissolve in it. Therefore the pH, if truly pure, would remain the same at 7.0.

    Why are pH values different? ›

    Now that we know that pH is dependent on concentration of the acid, we can also have the scenario that both acids A and B are the same strong acid, eg HCl. If the concentration of acid A is higher, it will dissociate to give more H+ in solution, hence A will have a lower pH.

    Why the pH values of the two acids are different? ›

    Different acids have different strengths: The amount of dissociation to H+ and the anion. Since pH depends on the H+ concentration, for the same concentration a strong acid would have a lower pH (H+ concentration) and a weak acid would have a higher pH (lower H+ concentration).

    What does the difference between pH in water and pH in CaCl2 depict? ›

    Buffer capacity is measured a different way, but the difference between pH in water and CaCl2 gives you an indication of buffer capacity.

    What is the pH value of CaCl2? ›

    Calcium chloride is an inorganic compound, a salt with the chemical formula CaCl 2. It is a white crystalline solid at room temperature, and it is highly soluble in water.
    ...
    Calcium chloride.
    Names
    Solubility in acetone0.1 g/kg (20 °C)
    Solubility in pyridine16.6 g/kg
    Acidity (pKa)8–9 (anhydrous) 6.5–8.0 (hexahydrate)
    63 more rows

    Will calcium chloride raise pH in soil? ›

    Calcium chloride, calcium nitrate and calcium sulfate are all considered to be neutral salts, in that they will not directly raise or lower the soil pH.

    Was the soil pH higher or lower in distilled water than in 0.01 m CaCl2? ›

    Measurement in a soil that has been dried (then rewetted using distilled water) will be lower than that obtained when the soil is wet (in situ). When 0.01 M CaCl2 is used, the resulting pH is usually lower than pH-H2O but not as much as pH–KCl.

    Does calcium chloride raise pH of water? ›

    Calcium chloride is a salt compound that is often used in pools as a pH buffer. When added to water, it increases the water's alkalinity, which can help to stabilize pH levels.

    Does higher pH mean stronger? ›

    Lower pH number means stronger acid, higher pH number means stronger base. It can be a little confusing, but the lower the pH of a substance is, the stronger of an acid it is.

    What factors affect pH value? ›

    4 Factors that Affect PH
    • CO2 Concentration in Water. The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) dissolved in water becomes a factor that affects pH. ...
    • Temperature. ...
    • Carbonate and Bicarbonate Concentrations. ...
    • Organic Material Decomposition Process.
    Jul 8, 2020

    What happens if the pH is higher or lower? ›

    pHs of less than 7 indicate acidity, whereas a pH of greater than 7 indicates a base. pH is really a measure of the relative amount of free hydrogen and hydroxyl ions in the water. Water that has more free hydrogen ions is acidic, whereas water that has more free hydroxyl ions is basic.

    What pH is a strong base? ›

    Strong Base Solution: Strong bases can completely dissolve in water. Their pH value is extremely high, usually between 12 to 14.

    Which pH value would be the strongest acid? ›

    As per the question fluoroantimonic acid ( ) is the strongest acid with a pH value of -31.3.

    How can you calculate the difference between two pH values? ›

    We take the higher value and subtract the lower one: 6.6 – 5.8 = 0.8. When we look up 0.8 in the table, we get 6.3. So the lower pH of 5.8 is 6.3 times more acid than the higher pH of 6.6. Using this table, you can easily determine how two pH values compare to one another, up to a difference of 3 pH units.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Kelle Weber

    Last Updated: 03/02/2023

    Views: 5331

    Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

    Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Kelle Weber

    Birthday: 2000-08-05

    Address: 6796 Juan Square, Markfort, MN 58988

    Phone: +8215934114615

    Job: Hospitality Director

    Hobby: tabletop games, Foreign language learning, Leather crafting, Horseback riding, Swimming, Knapping, Handball

    Introduction: My name is Kelle Weber, I am a magnificent, enchanting, fair, joyous, light, determined, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.